SOLUTION 01·Business-First Technology

Put Your Organization's Knowledge to Work, With Permissions Intact

Policies, product documentation, contracts and support history usually sit across wikis, shared drives, ticketing tools and inboxes. Kramora designs AI assistants that retrieve from those sources, respect who is allowed to see what, cite where every answer came from and route uncertain or sensitive requests to people. The result is an assistant your teams can question with confidence and your security team can reason about.

BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS

The Operating Challenge

Where the bottleneck shows up: “Our people spend hours hunting through wikis, drives and old tickets for answers that already exist.”
What changes: Staff ask in plain language and receive a sourced answer drawn from approved content, with links back to the original documents.
Where the bottleneck shows up: “We ran a chatbot pilot, and nobody could tell when its answers were wrong.”
What changes: Every answer carries citations, and an evaluation set tracks accuracy on real questions before and after each change.
Where the bottleneck shows up: “Security will not approve an assistant that might expose HR, finance or client files to the wrong people.”
What changes: Retrieval enforces the same permissions as the source systems, so users only see content they could already open.
Where the bottleneck shows up: “Our knowledge changes every week, and any assistant we build will drift out of date.”
What changes: Ingestion pipelines resync content on a schedule and retire superseded documents, so answers follow the current version.
SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE

What the Solution Includes

01

Knowledge access

The first decision is which sources the assistant may use and which questions it should answer. Connectors pull content from document stores, intranets, ticketing tools and databases, keeping metadata such as owner, date and access group. Narrow, well-understood sources make a better first release than connecting everything at once.

02

Retrieval design

Documents are split, enriched and indexed in vector databases alongside keyword search, because exact terms like product codes and clause numbers matter. Retrieval combines both signals and reranks results before the model sees them. Each answer is generated only from retrieved passages and cites them.

03

Access control

Permissions from source systems travel with every indexed chunk and are checked at query time against the signed-in user's identity. A finance analyst and a field technician asking the same question can receive different, correctly scoped answers. Sensitive collections can be excluded entirely or placed behind additional approval.

04

Human review and escalation

Assistants are told to decline when sources do not support an answer, and low-confidence or policy-sensitive requests route to a named owner. User feedback on each answer feeds a review queue for content owners. That loop improves both the assistant and the underlying documentation.

05

Evaluation and operations

A test set built from real questions measures grounding, accuracy and refusal behavior, and it runs before every prompt, model or index change. Production monitoring tracks usage, unanswered questions and cost. Teams can see whether the assistant is getting better and where knowledge gaps remain.

SYSTEM DESIGN

Illustrative Architecture

ILLUSTRATIVE
Data & Workflow Flow
Knowledge Sources → Ingestion & Indexing → Permission-Aware Retrieval → Model & Guardrails → Cited Answer → Review & Feedback

Illustrative reference architecture, not a client implementation, showing how a question moves from connected sources to a cited, permission-checked answer.

01 Knowledge Sources
Wikis, drives, tickets and databases with existing permissions
02 Ingestion & Indexing
Chunking, metadata, embeddings and keyword index kept in sync
03 Permission-Aware Retrieval
Hybrid search filtered by the user's identity and groups
04 Model & Guardrails
Grounded generation with policy checks and refusal rules
05 Cited Answer
Response with source links delivered in the user's channel
06 Review & Feedback
Escalations, ratings and evaluation results improve each release

Outcomes to Expect

Faster access to answers that already exist inside the organization
Answers traceable to a named source document
AI adoption that security and risk teams can review
A quality baseline that every assistant change is measured against
APPLICATION SCENARIO

Policy and procedure assistant for an operations team

ILLUSTRATIVE
Situation:

A logistics company keeps operating procedures, HR policies and customer contract terms in a document management system, an intranet and a ticketing tool. Supervisors want quick answers, while contract terms must stay visible only to account teams.

How Kramora would approach it:

Kramora would start with a narrow set of high-value supervisor questions and the sources that answer them, then build hybrid retrieval that mirrors existing access groups. An evaluation set drawn from real questions would gate the first release, with low-confidence answers routed to a policy owner for review.

Illustrative concept — not a client implementation.
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

Frequently Asked Questions

Model choice follows the use case, data sensitivity and hosting constraints. Kramora works with OpenAI-compatible APIs and can evaluate hosted or self-managed options within your AWS, Azure or Google Cloud environment. The architecture keeps the model replaceable so the decision can be revisited as options change.

LET’S SOLVE THE BOTTLENECK

Start with the operating challenge.

Tell us where work slows down today. We will help you decide whether this solution fits and what a first phase could look like.